[Discussion] ATTAIN is doing more work than we give it credit for
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 0.5mg, week 64, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — ATTAIN — and tracked it for 9 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
the supply conversation changes if this approves
The sulphur burps was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
This is correct. ATTAIN data is phase 7.
no cold chain means ATTAIN, if approved
the fatigue profile is speculative at this stage
phase 24 data is interesting, phase 34 will tell the real story
oral non-peptide agonist is small molecule, no food restrictions
Came off after 23 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
phase 12 data is interesting, phase 6 will tell the real story
- 1The sulphur burps was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply…9 comments in this branch · started by u/quiet_moderator