three years of triple agonist threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
Confession thread, sort of. I went from 7.5mg to 2.4mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 11 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have early…
TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 98.3% weight loss but the fatigue profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.
TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 98.3% weight loss but the fatigue profile on the highest arm was rough.
Adding to this: TRIUMPH is doing more work than the comment implies.
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
[deleted]
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
the 2.5mg arm is different from 5mg, results do not transfer
Which trial arm and what was the n?
the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual