c/retatrutide wiki
Everything you would otherwise have to learn by getting a post removed. Triple agonist. Phase 3 data, research-grade material, and a lot of unknowns.
wiki page · last revised 16 Jul 2026 · maintained by community volunteers
On this page
What this community is for
Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.
c/retatrutide was created on 6 Sep 2023 and currently has 64,900 members and 130 captured submissions. It sits in the busiest tier of the site, which mostly affects how fast a question gets answered rather than how well.
The one-line version
Triple agonist. Phase 3 data, research-grade material, and a lot of unknowns.
Rules, and why each exists
Community rules come first, then the six site-wide rules that apply everywhere on GLP Research Hub. Community rules are enforced by the moderators listed at the bottom of this page; site rules are enforced by everyone.
- Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
- Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
- Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
And the site rules, which are short on purpose:
- Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
- Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
- Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
- No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
- No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
- Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Terms you will see
Vocabulary that turns up constantly in c/retatrutide. Each links to the topic page, which collects every submission that touches it.
- retatrutide — triple GIP/GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonist, still in development.
- triple agonist — discussed frequently in this community — see the topic page for every submission that touches it.
- glucagon — discussed frequently in this community — see the topic page for every submission that touches it.
- TRIUMPH — discussed frequently in this community — see the topic page for every submission that touches it.
- phase 2 — discussed frequently in this community — see the topic page for every submission that touches it.
- dose escalation — discussed frequently in this community — see the topic page for every submission that touches it.
Start here
The twelve highest-scoring submissions in this community. Not necessarily the most correct — the most agreed-with, which is a different thing, and worth remembering when you read them.
- [Results] 2 weeks, 46kg, and phase 2 was the hard part — 14k points, 45 comments, 2 years ago
- switched from 2.5mg to 10mg and the early fullness got better, not worse — 13k points, 37 comments, 1 year ago
- glucagon — my 7-week log, condensed into one table — 12k points, 37 comments, 1 year ago
- what changed for me between week 65 and week 13 — 12k points, 35 comments, 2 years ago
- [Results] 37 weeks, 16kg, and phase 2 was the hard part — 9.9k points, 50 comments, 1 year ago
- unpopular opinion: retatrutide is massively overrated — 8.7k points, 68 comments, 2 years ago
- [Lab] 5th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part — 8.5k points, 16 comments, 1 year ago
- [Lab] 10th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part — 8.4k points, 46 comments, 1 year ago
- 12 months in and triple agonist is still the thing I get wrong — 8.3k points, 41 comments, 2 years ago
- does retatrutide actually matter or is it forum lore at this point — 8.1k points, 25 comments, 2 years ago
- triple agonist: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 — 8k points, 13 comments, 2 years ago
- does glucagon actually matter or is it forum lore at this point — 7.8k points, 42 comments, 11 months ago
Asked constantly
- the glucagon arm is why the appetite effect feels different
- reta made me not want food OR water and that is its own problem
- [Question] why is reta purity testing so much more variable between labs
- the dose escalation thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down
- [Question] how do you actually verify dose escalation
- [Question] how do you actually verify triple agonist
- [Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside
- help me understand glucagon, I have read the wiki twice
- [Question] dose escalation — what am I missing here
- what changed for me between week 30 and week 79
If your question is on that list, read the answers there first. If it is not, ask it — that is what the community is for, and "this has been asked" is only a helpful reply when it comes with a link.
Who runs this
Moderation here is done by volunteers who also post as normal members. They are not clinicians, not vendors, and not paid.
- u/reta_and_regret — Went too fast on retatrutide. Learned. Posting the whole embarrassing arc.
- u/trialwatch_theo — I read the supplementary appendix so you do not have to. Pre-registration or it is a hypothesis.
- u/incretin_ivy — GIP/GLP-1 co-agonism is genuinely interesting pharmacology, separate from the weight story.
- u/ledger_mod — c/vendorvetting + c/scamalerts mod. Every claim needs a receipt or it gets a [needs source] flair.
Wiki pages are community-maintained summaries, not clinical guidance. If a wiki page and your clinician disagree, your clinician wins.