[Question] how do you actually verify dose escalation
Quick one. Canada here.
glucagon works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 4 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 99.1% weight loss but the sulphur burps profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 97.4% weight loss but the sulphur burps profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.
TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 97.4% weight loss but the sulphur burps profile on the highest arm was rough.
Adding to this: dose escalation is doing more work than the comment implies.
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
the 5mg arm is different from 2.5mg, results do not transfer
the 0.5mg arm is different from 1.0mg, results do not transfer
Strongly agree.
Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
- 1TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 99.1% weight loss but the sulphur burps profile on…12 comments in this branch · started by u/arne_amankwah