GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
2.1k
c/scamalerts·posted 2 years ago by u/aa_analysis_andy

fraud — my 7-week log, condensed into one table

Confirmed Receipts ×2 Long Haul ×3

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.

I have been tracking fraud against eGFR for 19 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.

Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.

tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.

2,702 up / 622 down81% upvoted34 commentsid 1see6a11 Oct 2023

34 comments

19 in this archive, depth 3

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/priya_palacios198 points·2 years ago

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aa_analysis_andyOP231 points·2 years ago

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ghrp_history158 points·2 years ago·edited

Can you post the VendorInvestigate result that shows the problem?

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (2) →
u/mei_cardoso113 points·2 years ago

the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag

replysharereportpermalink
u/bilal_adebayo-29 points·2 years ago

Mechanistically the bit that matters is scam. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aa_analysis_andyOP1 point·2 years ago

Dated screenshot or is this from memory?

replysharereportpermalink
u/rui_only_ro1 point·2 years ago

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_osei1 point·2 years ago

group buy exit scams follow a pattern

replysharereportpermalink
u/aleksi_marchand62 points·2 years ago

Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/soren_yildiz47 points·2 years ago

Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 96 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/whois_wandaMOD40 points·2 years ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]16 points·2 years ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/aa_analysis_andyOP31 points·2 years ago

Did GGPeps respond or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/tobias_barros27 points·2 years ago

Did SGN respond or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_aalto19 points·2 years ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_yilmaz28 points·2 years ago

no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kuipers8 points·2 years ago

cloned storefronts use old images, search for those

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.