GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of fraud vs fake COA — genuinely asking which matters more — 19 comments in the full submission. View in context.
5.1k
c/scamalerts·submitted 9 months ago by u/milan_villalobos

fraud vs fake COA — genuinely asking which matters more

Confirmedbranch of 6 comments

Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/reconstitution repeats that scam is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 22 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because…

Read the full submission and all 19 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 9 months ago
u/rasmus_kuipers625 points·9 months ago

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

replysharereportpermalink
u/milan_villalobosOP259 points·9 months ago

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 50 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/jarno_cabrera346 points·8 months ago

a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so

replysharereportpermalink
u/milan_villalobosOP-28 points·8 months ago

cloned storefronts use old images, search for those

replysharereportpermalink
u/milan_villalobosOP1 point·8 months ago

The BCH exit scam collected 21 orders and disappeared. Order ids 25 through 21 all silent.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_batista367 points·9 months ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →