GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
5.1k
c/scamalerts·posted 9 months ago by u/milan_villalobos

fraud vs fake COA — genuinely asking which matters more

Confirmed Slow Clap ×8 Receipts ×1 Well Actually ×3

Genuinely asking, not being difficult.

Everyone in c/reconstitution repeats that scam is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 22 threads of people agreeing with each other.

Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?

I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.

5,484 up / 338 down94% upvoted19 commentsid ri6p4q1 Nov 2025

19 comments

16 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/rasmus_kuipers625 points·9 months ago

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

replysharereportpermalink
u/milan_villalobosOP259 points·9 months ago

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 50 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/jarno_cabrera346 points·8 months ago

a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so

replysharereportpermalink
u/milan_villalobosOP-28 points·8 months ago

cloned storefronts use old images, search for those

replysharereportpermalink
u/milan_villalobosOP1 point·8 months ago

The BCH exit scam collected 21 orders and disappeared. Order ids 25 through 21 all silent.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_batista367 points·9 months ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mei_cardoso318 points·8 months ago

This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.

replysharereportpermalink
u/careful_gradient_notes219 points·8 months ago

The cloned QYB store used our old homepage image from 2023. Reverse image search caught it in 24 seconds.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_cardoso116 points·8 months ago

Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 98.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
load more comments (2) →
u/nordic_pricing286 points·8 months ago

Batch 8 appeared on JEEP, WXT, and JEEP claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kian_verhoeven170 points·8 months ago

Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_zielinski102 points·8 months ago

the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting

replysharereportpermalink
u/jarno_cabrera137 points·8 months ago

Mechanistically the bit that matters is cloned site. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.