[Lab] SGN reta — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2%
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 0.5mg, week 58, injection-site soreness present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — constipation — and tracked it for 7 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
resting heart rate moved up 15 bpm and settled back down when I stopped escalating
nausea on day 2 is normal, nausea after week 76 is worth checking
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
Went to A&E convinced it was pancreatitis. Lipase normal. It was gallstones. Get checked, do not post and wait.
sulphur burps are disgusting but not dangerous, 12 weeks and they stopped
constipation is real, boring, and fixable
Not to be pedantic but hair loss and sulphur burps are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Went to A&E convinced it was pancreatitis. Lipase normal. It was gallstones. Get checked, do not post and wait.
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
the muscle cramps passes. i promise. not medical advice.
hair loss is real and usually reversible when you stabilize
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
the food-noise thing stops around week 68 for most people
the food-noise thing stops around week 68 for most people
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
week 57 and the nausea is finally getting better
Rodent data is rodent data.
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 95.1% on the same vial is normal.
Rodent data is rodent data.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 95 weeks to accept.
Did the constipation start before or after the dose increase?
sulphur burps are disgusting but not dangerous, 13 weeks and they stopped
Slight fix: the number was 97.2, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Is that before or after you stabilized your sulphur burps?
Is that before or after you stabilized your sulphur burps?
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
- 1Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell…14 comments in this branch · started by u/food_noise_gone
- 2Went to A&E convinced it was pancreatitis. Lipase normal. It was gallstones.…4 comments in this branch · started by u/peptidemeter_pat