[Meta] proposal — a flair for nausea posts
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: hair loss matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 12 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 31 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
This is correct. The the food-noise thing is horrible for three weeks and then just ends.
My constipation was worst at 2.4mg and better at 0.5mg, which makes no sense but it is real.
My sulphur burps was worst at 10mg and better at 7.5mg, which makes no sense but it is real.
early fullness at 0.25mg is different from 15mg
Is that before or after you stabilized your nausea?
the food-noise thing stops around week 50 for most people
This is correct. The sulphur burps is horrible for three weeks and then just ends.
This is correct.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Yeah, the reflux hit on day 23 for me too, not day 1.
the the food-noise thing passes. i promise. not medical advice.
- 1This is correct. The the food-noise thing is horrible for three weeks and…6 comments in this branch · started by u/zeynep_ndiaye
- 2the food-noise thing stops around week 50 for most people5 comments in this branch · started by u/rafael_ostergaard