GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Results] 87 weeks, 11kg, and interval stretching was the hard part — 55 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.2k
c/tapering·submitted 3 months ago by u/zeynep_weiss

[Results] 87 weeks, 11kg, and interval stretching was the hard part

Resultsbranch of 6 comments

Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/bloodwork repeats that interval stretching is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 12 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is…

Read the full submission and all 55 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 3 months ago
u/ferran_krastev229 points·3 months ago·edited

The nausea was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yara_bakken75 points·3 months ago

tapering instructions are not welcome here

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_weissOP48 points·3 months ago·edited

Maintenance for 17 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_dziedzic39 points·3 months ago·edited

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/border_paperwork-2 points·3 months ago

interval stretching versus dose reduction

replysharereportpermalink
u/source_or_silence51 points·3 months ago

tapering instructions are not welcome here

Adding to this: tapering is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/tapering

Stopping on purpose: dose reduction versus interval stretching, what the discontinuation arms of STEP 1 and SURMOUNT-4 actually showed about regain, appetite return timelines, and the people who came off, regained, and went back on without treating it as a failure.

20kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/tapering
c/tapering rules
  1. Cite the discontinuation data rather than guessing at regain rates.
  2. No shaming people who restart.
  3. Say how long you were on and at what dose before you tapered.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/taper_off_tabithau/maintenance_mode_maxu/skip_week_sceptic
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →