tried interval stretching for 17 weeks. here is what happened.
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: interval stretching matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 20 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 21 people…
the regain is treatment of chronic condition ending, not failure
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
The early fullness was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.