GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Trial Data] what the STEP 4 and SURMOUNT-4 withdrawal arms actually showed — 27 comments in the full submission. View in context.
275
c/tapering·submitted 7 days ago by u/camila_marchand

[Trial Data] what the STEP 4 and SURMOUNT-4 withdrawal arms actually showed

Trial Databranch of 7 comments

Confession thread, sort of. I went from 15mg to 7.5mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 3 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have early…

Read the full submission and all 27 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 6 days ago
u/laila_delgado4 points·6 days ago

Second this question. I have wondered about interval stretching for 19 months and never seen a straight answer.

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_delgado-9 points·6 days ago

tapering instructions are not welcome here

replysharereportpermalink
u/arne_amankwah1 point·6 days ago

tapering instructions are not welcome here

Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_stanescu1 point·6 days ago·edited

the 13 week discontinuation arm is the data

replysharereportpermalink
u/peptidemeter_pat1 point·5 days ago

STEP 1 and SURMOUNT-4 discontinuation arms show regain

replysharereportpermalink
u/ilias_kaufmann1 point·5 days ago·edited

Yeah, regain is not a failure.

replysharereportpermalink
u/osman_eriksen1 point·6 days ago

no shaming people who restart

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/tapering

Stopping on purpose: dose reduction versus interval stretching, what the discontinuation arms of STEP 1 and SURMOUNT-4 actually showed about regain, appetite return timelines, and the people who came off, regained, and went back on without treating it as a failure.

20kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/tapering
c/tapering rules
  1. Cite the discontinuation data rather than guessing at regain rates.
  2. No shaming people who restart.
  3. Say how long you were on and at what dose before you tapered.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/taper_off_tabithau/maintenance_mode_maxu/skip_week_sceptic
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →