[Meta] the SURMOUNT rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining
Been lurking in c/compounding for about 13 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 29, 0.5mg, and GIP is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 13 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to know is…
Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply scaled versions.
Cosigning.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
week 70 on Mounjaro and the appetite profile is genuinely different from sema
How long at each step before you escalated?
the GIP side does different things than the GLP-1 side, that is the point
This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 97.4% body weight at 23 weeks.
nope, the equivalence to semaglutide is not known, comparing 15mg tirz to 2.4mg sema is guessing
SURMOUNT data is messier than STEP data but the weight loss is there
The dual agonism story is real. The appetite is physically different from semaglutide alone.