tried SURPASS for 11 weeks. here is what happened.
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/compounding repeats that hazard ratio is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 4 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true…
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
SELECT reported a SURMOUNT hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
the discontinuation arms are the interesting part, not the TRIUMPH endpoints
the discontinuation arms are the interesting part, not the TRIUMPH endpoints
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.