what would you tell week-1 you about hazard ratio
Right, the TRIUMPH question again, but with numbers this time. I have 6 data points over 34 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing…
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
[removed by moderator]
off-label use data is different from approved-indication data
Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.