[Paper] SURMOUNT-4 withdrawal arm, read the appendix not the abstract
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: FLOW matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 24 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 35 people measuring the same…
STEP, SURMOUNT, SURPASS, SELECT, FLOW, TRIUMPH — read the appendix
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with STEP, not with what you concluded.
dropout handling matters, especially on GI-heavy populations