am I the only one who found SELECT harder than the injections
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: FLOW matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 18 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 25 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
SELECT reported a SURPASS hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.
the 7 week readout is different from the 6 week readout
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
SURMOUNT-4 discontinuation arm showed regain. That is the reality of a chronic disease treatment, not a failure.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
STEP 1 readout: 98.6% mean weight loss, absolute numbers matter. Spread around that mean is enormous.
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
- 1this should be in the wiki4 comments in this branch · started by u/marit_laurent