GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of the STEP question that gets asked weekly, answered properly — 18 comments in the full submission. View in context.
998
c/trialwatch·submitted 1 year ago by u/foam_head_fred

the STEP question that gets asked weekly, answered properly

Statsbranch of 4 comments

Been lurking in c/hplc for about 8 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 83, 10mg, and hazard ratio is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 3 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to know is…

Read the full submission and all 18 comments →

This branch

4 comments, started 1 year ago
u/week_four_wall73 points·1 year ago

event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone

replysharereportpermalink
u/aurel_mwangi59 points·1 year ago

Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.

replysharereportpermalink
u/foam_head_fredOP34 points·1 year ago

the relative risk reduction in headlines is not the whole story

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]42 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/trialwatch

Clinical trial reading group. New readouts, protocol amendments, endpoint definitions, dropout handling, and the difference between a press release and a publication. Absolute risk reduction and number-needed-to-treat are house dialect here.

34kmembers
95submissions
Nov 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/trialwatch rules
  1. Press-release-only posts must be flaired Press Release until a publication exists.
  2. Give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body.
  3. Relative risk reduction alone is not a result. Show the absolute numbers.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.