GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of why does nobody talk about VendorInvestigate — 42 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.9k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 11 months ago by u/thermal_mass_tom

why does nobody talk about VendorInvestigate

PSAbranch of 7 comments

Right, the testing question again, but with numbers this time. I have 10 data points over 36 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…

Read the full submission and all 42 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 11 months ago
u/zeynep_duarte128 points·11 months ago

vendor staff must self-identify, full stop

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_nilsen41 points·11 months ago

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/boots_or_bust152 points·11 months ago

Not to be pedantic but testing and reship are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sena_ferreira33 points·11 months ago

Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_petrescu89 points·11 months ago

Slight fix: the number was 95.1, not 94.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/coa_janitormod · c/coa105 points·11 months ago

the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

replysharereportpermalink
u/sofia_ferreira22 points·11 months ago

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →