GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] can we stop arguing about Janoshik until somebody posts a number — 20 comments in the full submission. View in context.
446
c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 year ago by u/throwaway_titration

[Discussion] can we stop arguing about Janoshik until somebody posts a number

Discussionbranch of 6 comments

Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 7.5mg, week 89, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — VendorInvestigate — and tracked it for 17 weeks. Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted…

Read the full submission and all 20 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/bastian_aalto30 points·1 year ago

First order from ERP was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/throwaway_titration8 points·1 year ago

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

replysharereportpermalink
u/thermal_mass_tom17 points·1 year ago

The PeptideMeter and Medutest numbers on the same vial from MKM came back 98.3% and 99.3%. Both are right, inter-lab variance is real.

replysharereportpermalink
u/throwaway_titrationOP10 points·1 year ago

GL Biochem took 24 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kofi_ferreira5 points·1 year ago

the batch number or it did not happen

replysharereportpermalink
u/patient_labslip_log25 points·1 year ago

Yeah, SWB took 14 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →