unpopular opinion: reship is massively overrated
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 0.5mg, week 55, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — testing — and tracked it for 16 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Ordered from QYB, got the vial, tested it myself via VendorInvestigate, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.
Reship experience: MKM asked for photos, processed it in 4 days, sent a replacement no questions. That is the template.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
Which service tested it and what did they come back with?
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
How many orders from SSA is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.
Crossposting this to c/tirzepatide because the people who need it are not reading this community.
[removed by moderator]
ERP took 22 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
the reship rate on WXT is actually pretty consistent
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
Ordered from SSA, got the vial, tested it myself via VendorInvestigate, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
Which service tested it and what did they come back with?
Order date, product, and result, in that order please?
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Correct.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
How many orders from GL Biochem is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.
- 1The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…13 comments in this branch · started by u/sofia_ferreira
- 2Crossposting this to c/tirzepatide because the people who need it are not…6 comments in this branch · started by u/patient_labslip_log