Week 81 update. 37kg down from the start, early fullness basically gone since about week 32. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I…
u/ahmed_fonseca
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Odense.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on [Results] 42 weeks, 25kg, and co-agonism was the hard part in c/cagrilintide · 63 points · 9 months ago
Strongly agree. REDEFINE is phase 15, not final.
comment on telehealth — my 11-week log, condensed into one table in c/compounding · 27 points · 9 months ago
the 503A/503B distinction is load-bearing, do not blur it
comment on 24 months in and TB-500 is still the thing I get wrong in c/researchpeptides · 234 points · 10 months ago
not approved for human use, full stop
comment on pharmacy vs prescription — genuinely asking which matters more in c/glp1eu · 31 points · 10 months ago
Strongly agree. Pricing is local.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about Apotheke in c/glp1eu · 8 points · 10 months ago
apotheke, receta, EMA — twenty-seven different answers
comment on [Lab] SGN sema — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/bloodwork · 36 points · 11 months ago
A1c moves slowly, quarterly is plenty
comment on test results: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 21 points · 11 months ago
My Janoshik result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. WXT deserves that note in the directory.
comment on test results: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 42 points · 11 months ago
My Medutest result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. MKM deserves that note in the directory.
Quick one. Canada here. Janoshik works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice…
comment on co-agonism — my 6-week log, condensed into one table in c/cagrilintide · 8 points · 11 months ago
amylin receptor distribution is different from GLP-1
comment on [Meta] the SURMOUNT rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/tirzepatide · 60 points · 1 year ago
Hard agree. The food noise disappears differently on the two compounds.
comment on [Discussion] the research peptides advice in here is 5 years out of date in c/researchpeptides · 1 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but research peptides and research peptides are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 26 weeks to accept.
comment on reading lean mass threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/glp1muscle · 9 points · 1 year ago
Slight fix: the number was 98.4, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on tried A1c for 9 weeks. here is what happened. in c/bloodwork · 2 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Question] Mounjaro — what am I missing here in c/tirzepatide · 103 points · 1 year ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on reading Zepbound threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/tirzepatide · 9 points · 1 year ago
This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 98.1% body weight at 21 weeks.
comment on batch: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 48 points · 1 year ago
the Medutest and PeptideMeter results differ by 20 points, both inside inter-lab variance
comment on prescription: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/glp1eu · -33 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Tag your country.
comment on [Meta] the state board rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/compounding · 36 points · 1 year ago
state board rules differ, say which state