u/anders_osei
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kristiansand.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify lowest effective dose in c/maintenancephase · 62 points · 10 months ago
the 5mg dose works fine for 58 weeks of the month
comment on am I the only one who found Medutest harder than the injections in c/vendorvetting · 7 points · 11 months ago
Yeah, TFC took 3 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 11 months ago
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #20 — Denmark, 27 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/maintenancephase · 14 points · 11 months ago
nobody posts about this part and it is the longest part
comment on why does nobody talk about VendorInvestigate in c/vendorvetting · 10 points · 11 months ago
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
comment on anyone else notice regain kicking in around week 90 in c/maintenancephase · 53 points · 12 months ago
the lowest dose you can stay on is not the lowest dose that works
comment on reading identity threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/researchpeptides · 8 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Name it precisely.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #10 — the Netherlands, 23 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/maintenancephase · 15 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Weight variance is normal at maintenance.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about PeptideMeter until somebody posts a number in c/vendorvetting · 95 points · 1 year ago
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
comment on [Discussion] the research peptides advice in here is 5 years out of date in c/researchpeptides · 14 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Name it precisely.
comment on [PSA] lowest effective dose is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/maintenancephase · 0 points · 1 year ago
lowest effective dose is lowest effective dose, find it or stay higher
comment on someone explain PDF metadata to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/scamalerts · 120 points · 1 year ago
The Medutest results I got back showed 97.4% but FGP claimed 98.4%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.
comment on scam: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 75 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/researchpeptides · 18 points · 1 year ago
evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human
comment on week 11 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 16 points · 1 year ago
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
comment on small win: goal weight stopped being a problem at week 20 in c/maintenancephase · 23 points · 1 year ago
the lowest dose you can stay on is not the lowest dose that works
comment on what changed for me between week 50 and week 93 in c/vendorvetting · 69 points · 1 year ago
Tracking number removed.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Discussion] the PDF metadata advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/scamalerts · 4 points · 1 year ago
Dated screenshot or is this from memory?
comment on handling is the most under-discussed thing in c/progresspics in c/researchpeptides · 24 points · 1 year ago
How many weeks between the two measurements?
comment on regain — my 14-week log, condensed into one table in c/maintenancephase · 10 points · 1 year ago
regain after taper is expected, plan for it