u/andres_restrepo

What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.

customs clearance often breaks the cold chain, factor that in

Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.

Crossposting this to c/tapering because the people who need it are not reading this community.

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

axis labels included, always

This is correct. DEXA is the standard.

ALT is where the fatty-liver story shows up first

the gradient is doing the separation work, not the column alone

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with progress, not with what you concluded.

This is correct. ApoB is the better marker.

Small correction: the trial was 10 weeks, not 10. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

Reconstituted or dry powder?

Adding to this: ice pack is doing more work than the comment implies.

the gradient is doing the separation work, not the column alone

Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.

heart rate and dose escalation need actual measurements, not impressions

heart rate and dose escalation need actual measurements, not impressions

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 48 weeks to accept.

Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

eGFR noise during rapid loss is expected

resistance training is sarcopenia not optional