u/arne_amankwah
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Pune.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 3 of 5
comment on [Lab] 11th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/cryptopay · 25 points · 6 months ago
confirmations are chargeback, the exchange rate at 8 blocks is the deal
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 20 in c/glp1muscle · 7 points · 6 months ago
lean mass retention is the 61 week conversation
comment on the appetite return thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/tapering · -16 points · 7 months ago
Yeah, regain is not a failure.
comment on three years of chargeback threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/cryptopay · 125 points · 7 months ago
What was the gas and did it matter?
comment on the denial question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 7 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 9 weeks, not 6. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on USDC — 23 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/cryptopay · 16 points · 7 months ago
Which network and did the vendor confirm they credit it?
comment on [PSA] food noise is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/semaglutide · 9 points · 7 months ago
Strongly agree. If it is not working at 1.7mg after 10 weeks, going up is not automatically the answer.
comment on small win: A1c stopped being a problem at week 51 in c/t2dglp1 · 218 points · 8 months ago
Strongly agree. A1c matters as much as weight.
comment on three years of protein threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1muscle · 26 points · 8 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on [Question] crypto — what am I missing here in c/cryptopay · 24 points · 8 months ago
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
comment on [Discussion] the T2D advice in here is 19 years out of date in c/t2dglp1 · 32 points · 8 months ago
glycaemic control first, that is the original indication
comment on someone explain appeal to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/insurancefights · 178 points · 9 months ago
This is correct. Appeal letters work.
comment on [Meta] the crypto rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/cryptopay · 12 points · 9 months ago
memo/tag requirements differ by network
comment on is it normal to get fatigue at week 80 in c/t2dglp1 · -20 points · 10 months ago
Yeah, glycaemic control is the original use.
comment on copay — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/insurancefights · 19 points · 10 months ago
This is correct. Appeal letters work.
comment on does glucagon actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/retatrutide · 208 points · 11 months ago
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
comment on the appeal question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/insurancefights · 113 points · 11 months ago
formulary exclusions are negotiable sometimes
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for chargeback posts in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 12 months ago
The discount was 98.4% but gas ate half of it. Still worth it but the math matters.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for chargeback posts in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 12 months ago
escrow for group buys is standard, use it
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether interval stretching is why in c/tapering · 174 points · 1 year ago
the people who came off and restarted without shame
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.