u/baseline_drifter

research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

ask your actual doctor, not us

no medication-stopping advice, ever

the dosing is steep, the sulphur burps reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet

hypoglycaemia risk when stacked with metformin

no advice on evading inspection or misdeclaring

protein targets in g/kg

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.

triple agonism is dose escalation, do not generalise

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

Yeah, the muscle cramps hit on day 13 for me too, not day 1.

CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

Resting heart rate up 12 bpm from baseline, settled back down once I stopped escalating. Tracked daily so I am confident.

Slight fix: the number was 98.6, not 98.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

seizure and reship are different outcomes

no advice on evading inspection or misdeclaring

The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.