genuine question about ApoB that I am slightly embarrassed to ask
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.
The advice on ApoB in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.
I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
[removed by moderator]
Baseline ALT: 96.2. Week 53: 97.2. Same lab, fasted, same time of day. Trend matters.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Slight fix: the number was 98.6, not 98.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
post reference ranges with your numbers, units differ by country and lab
Tracking number removed.
Adding to this: baseline labs is doing more work than the comment implies.
nobody here can tell you what a result means for you
ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy
redact identifying details from lab PDFs before posting
- 1Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.7 comments in this branch · started by u/liver_enzyme_liz