[Results] 16 weeks on 7.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring
Right, the lipids question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 15 data points over 16 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 20, not week 69. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
redact identifying details from lab PDFs before posting
ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy
Same lab both times?
post reference ranges with your numbers, units differ by country and lab
nobody here can tell you what a result means for you
Do you have baseline to compare to?
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
A1c moves slowly, quarterly is plenty
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
ferritin from 5 to 3 is movement, not noise
baseline is the most important bloodwork measurement, you cannot collect it later
triglycerides from 11 to 7 is movement, not noise
post reference ranges with your numbers, units differ by country and lab
triglycerides from 11 to 7 is movement, not noise
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
redact identifying details from lab PDFs before posting
nobody here can tell you what a result means for you
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
Same lab both times?
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
eGFR noise during rapid loss is expected
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
eGFR noise during rapid loss is expected
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
- 1Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.12 comments in this branch · started by u/lipid_panel_larry
- 2Same lab both times?6 comments in this branch · started by u/milos_trevino