Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: formulary matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides…
u/camila_vasquez
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Accra.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on Canada: seizure, and what it actually costs here in c/customs · 91 points · 1 year ago
customs holds vary by season
comment on the STEP question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/trialwatch · 114 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.
comment on does goal actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/progresspics · 121 points · 1 year ago
Second this question. I have wondered about non-scale victory for 19 months and never seen a straight answer.
comment on [Discussion] the SURPASS advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 year ago
off-label use data is different from approved-indication data
comment on [PSA] timeframe is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/progresspics · 251 points · 1 year ago
What are you comparing it against though?
comment on [PSA] timeframe is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/progresspics · 118 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Process matters more than the number.
comment on reading endpoint threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/trialwatch · 22 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on help me understand appeal, I have read the wiki twice in c/insurancefights · 10 points · 1 year ago
copay is separate from coverage
comment on genuine question about external review that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/insurancefights · 115 points · 2 years ago
Denied for prior auth, resubmitted with step therapy documentation, approved on appeal. The criteria exist, you just have to meet them.
comment on switched from 15mg to 1.0mg and the reflux got better, not worse in c/insurancefights · 9 points · 2 years ago
External review overturned the denial. Took 17 weeks but the process exists.
comment on switched from 15mg to 1.0mg and the reflux got better, not worse in c/insurancefights · 13 points · 2 years ago
external review is the appeal after insurance says no
comment on switched from 15mg to 1.0mg and the reflux got better, not worse in c/insurancefights · 68 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, the denial code matters, it tells you what to fight.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for STEP posts in c/trialwatch · 428 points · 2 years ago
This is correct. Discontinuation arms show the regain reality.
comment on T2D vs metformin — genuinely asking which matters more in c/t2dglp1 · 9 points · 2 years ago
the triglycerides change is the signal
comment on [Discussion] the small molecule advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/orforglipron · 23 points · 2 years ago
the fatigue profile is speculative at this stage
comment on [Discussion] the small molecule advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/orforglipron · 16 points · 2 years ago
Came off after 41 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
comment on my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether step therapy is why in c/insurancefights · 144 points · 2 years ago
Copay was denial for the copay then another 21% of the total. Read the actual plan document.
comment on SELECT is the most under-discussed thing in c/bloodwork in c/trialwatch · -13 points · 2 years ago
Phase 2 or phase 3?
comment on SELECT is the most under-discussed thing in c/bloodwork in c/trialwatch · 138 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.