u/dario_boateng
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Nantes.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on why does nobody talk about biopsy in c/survodutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on is it normal to get early fullness at week 14 in c/coa · 184 points · 1 year ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring area percent at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 306 points · 1 year ago
the related substances line is where the story is
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 35 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/orforglipron · 9 points · 1 year ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on three years of declared value threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/customs · -38 points · 1 year ago
seizure letters: redact everything identifying
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 20 weeks to accept.
comment on [Results] 52 weeks, 25kg, and dual agonist was the hard part in c/survodutide · 35 points · 1 year ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on genuine question about purity that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/coa · 112 points · 1 year ago
Slight fix: the number was 99.2, not 99.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on stalled for 23 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 634 points · 1 year ago
Batch number and date of analysis? Both are load-bearing.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring certificate of analysis at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 62 points · 1 year ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on non-peptide in c/orforglipron · 30 points · 1 year ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is oral GLP-1. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on Canada: seizure, and what it actually costs here in c/customs · 1 points · 1 year ago
seizure letters: redact everything identifying
comment on genuine question about ATTAIN that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/orforglipron · 15 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, small molecule changes the whole game.
comment on three years of area percent threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 642 points · 2 years ago
comment on unpopular opinion: small molecule is massively overrated in c/orforglipron · 265 points · 2 years ago
Strongly agree. The supply impact would be huge.
comment on [Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 98.0% and 97.9% in c/coa · 143 points · 2 years ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes.
Adding to this: purity is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on reading MASH threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/survodutide · 25 points · 2 years ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on [Discussion] purity is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/coa · 375 points · 2 years ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on jurisdiction is the most under-discussed thing in c/researchpeptides in c/customs · 7 points · 2 years ago
no advice on evading inspection or misdeclaring
comment on jurisdiction is the most under-discussed thing in c/researchpeptides in c/customs · 1 points · 2 years ago
no advice on evading inspection or misdeclaring
comment on tried purity for 3 weeks. here is what happened. in c/coa · 22 points · 2 years ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.