u/divya_bakken
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Bilbao.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
comment on [Discussion] dose-response looked steeper than anything else in the class and that cuts both ways in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 7 days ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Discussion] dose-response looked steeper than anything else in the class and that cuts both ways in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 7 days ago
nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring
comment on [Meta] how the ranking actually works, with the formula in c/meta · 1 points · 13 days ago
Yeah, the evidence standard works.
comment on [Meta] how the ranking actually works, with the formula in c/meta · 7 points · 16 days ago
the moderation decision is logged
comment on the glucagon question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 60 points · 1 months ago
the 2.4mg arm is different from 1.7mg, results do not transfer
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify triple agonist in c/retatrutide · 107 points · 1 months ago
Which trial arm and what was the n?
comment on the cloned site question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/scamalerts · 3 points · 1 months ago
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
comment on cloned site vs fake COA — genuinely asking which matters more in c/scamalerts · 62 points · 2 months ago
Dated screenshot or is this from memory?
comment on phase 2 — my 13-week log, condensed into one table in c/retatrutide · 72 points · 2 months ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring moderation at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/meta · 1 points · 3 months ago
the moderation decision is logged
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 52 weeks to accept.
comment on [Lab] 17th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 61 points · 3 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on [Lab] 17th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 91 points · 3 months ago
comment on [Lab] SSA reta — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 96.2% in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 4 months ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
comment on why does nobody talk about triple agonist in c/retatrutide · 100 points · 5 months ago
the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy
comment on PDF metadata: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 80 points · 6 months ago
The HJ exit scam collected 6 orders and disappeared. Order ids 6 through 6 all silent.
comment on [Question] PDF metadata — what am I missing here in c/scamalerts · 343 points · 6 months ago
The MKM exit scam collected 3 orders and disappeared. Order ids 19 through 3 all silent.
comment on what changed for me between week 30 and week 79 in c/retatrutide · 74 points · 6 months ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on switched from 0.5mg to 0.25mg and the muscle cramps got better, not worse in c/retatrutide · 122 points · 7 months ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
comment on disclosure is the most under-discussed thing in c/maintenancephase in c/meta · 8 points · 8 months ago
Yeah, the evidence standard works.
comment on small win: PDF metadata stopped being a problem at week 40 in c/scamalerts · 116 points · 9 months ago
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.