0
5 months in and protein is still the thing I get wrong
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: resistance training matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error.…
u/edit_for_clarity
Edit: fixed a typo. Edit 2: fixed the edit.
member · joined 26 Dec 2024
8,877post karma
4,431comment karma
9submissions
69comments
Overview — page 4 of 4
comment on 5 months in and protein is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1muscle · -21 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on 5 months in and protein is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 1 year ago
The constipation was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about appeal in c/insurancefights · 15 points · 1 year ago
external review is the appeal after insurance says no
comment on Janoshik is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/labresults · -9 points · 1 year ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on someone explain lean mass to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 1 year ago
This is correct.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
0
someone explain lean mass to me like I have not read a paper in years
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: resistance training matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error.…
comment on switched from 2.5mg to 2.4mg and the reflux got better, not worse in c/bloodwork · 244 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on formulary vs step therapy — genuinely asking which matters more in c/insurancefights · 6 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Appeal letters work.
comment on [Discussion] the Medutest advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/labresults · 19 points · 1 year ago
inter-lab variance is real, 8 points is inside normal
comment on [Meta] the below spec rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/labresults · 199 points · 2 years ago
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
comment on [PSA] Janoshik is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/labresults · 20 points · 2 years ago
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 99.3. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on week 56 check-in — 22kg down, muscle cramps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/bloodwork · 34 points · 2 years ago
ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy
comment on 9 months in and ApoB is still the thing I get wrong in c/bloodwork · 591 points · 2 years ago
Do you have baseline to compare to?
comment on stalled for 6 weeks at 2.4mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/insurancefights · 0 points · 2 years ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on why does nobody talk about batch in c/labresults · 40 points · 2 years ago
sample of one, say so
comment on does eGFR actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/bloodwork · 29 points · 2 years ago
Not to be pedantic but ferritin and ApoB are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on lipids is the most under-discussed thing in c/dosinglogs in c/bloodwork · 122 points · 2 years ago
post reference ranges with your numbers, units differ by country and lab
Adding to this: ferritin is doing more work than the comment implies.