u/enzo_ferrari

event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone

Did anything else change in the same window?

provincial formularies differ sharply

SELECT reported a SURMOUNT hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.

gas versus discount arithmetic is real

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

The 503A pharmacy I used lost their shortage list eligibility. Same day, compounding became illegal. Rules are real.

Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.

customs clearance often adds 20 days, factor that in

I am going to push back on this slightly.

dropout handling matters, especially on GI-heavy populations

Genuine question — what concentration were you at?

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

escrow for group buys is standard, use it

stablecoin is network, never volatile coins

Adding to this: chargeback is doing more work than the comment implies.

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

Which lane and which carrier?

the lane table is community-maintained, lane changes

money lost to group buys