u/honest_syringe

This is correct. Weight variance is normal at maintenance.

the plateau is where the learning happens

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.

What dose are you on?

tendon and rodent data literature in rodents is interesting

long-running logs are the value

Did anything else change in the same window?

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

tendon and pentadecapeptide literature in rodents is interesting

nobody posts about this part and it is the longest part

The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.

everything else in the vial drawer, research peptides

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

the BPC-157 literature looks promising but rodent-only

template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result

Yeah, 503A and 503B are different regulatory animals.

Strongly agree.

Adding to this: tracking is doing more work than the comment implies.

Mechanistically the bit that matters is lowest effective dose. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

Yeah, 503A and 503B are different regulatory animals.