u/honest_syringe33
I post rarely and I check my numbers twice.
member · joined 24 Jan 2026
Comments — page 3 of 4
comment on [Results] 12 weeks, 31kg, and identity was the hard part in c/researchpeptides · 51 points · 11 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 4 weeks, not 4. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Results] 61 weeks on 0.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/progresspics · 18 points · 1 year ago
no commenting on anybody's body, comment on the process
comment on help me understand progress, I have read the wiki twice in c/progresspics · 118 points · 1 year ago
no commenting on anybody's body, comment on the process
comment on New Zealand: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/glp1aus · 84 points · 1 year ago
the regulatory TGA is the blocker
comment on shortage is the most under-discussed thing in c/customs in c/glp1aus · 14 points · 1 year ago
The the food-noise thing was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether phase 2 is why in c/retatrutide · 160 points · 1 year ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on why does nobody talk about dose escalation in c/retatrutide · 158 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on cold chain vs data logger — genuinely asking which matters more in c/coldchain · 60 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Dry powder is way more robust than liquid.
comment on genuine question about dose escalation that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/retatrutide · 107 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring packaging at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coldchain · 16 points · 1 year ago
no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal
comment on dose escalation: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 21 points · 1 year ago
phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial
comment on [Results] 2 weeks, 11kg, and glucagon was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 20 points · 1 year ago
heart rate and dose escalation need actual measurements, not impressions
comment on [PSA] TRIUMPH is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/retatrutide · 32 points · 1 year ago
i changed my mind reading this, which never happens
Disagree on that part. 99.1% and 99.2% on the same vial is normal.
comment on does retatrutide actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/retatrutide · 536 points · 2 years ago
Not to be pedantic but TRIUMPH and dose escalation are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on triple agonist — 22 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/retatrutide · 21 points · 2 years ago
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
comment on the milestone thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/progresspics · 53 points · 2 years ago
no images, none, not even redacted ones
Adding to this: milestone is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Discussion] the data logger advice in here is 6 years out of date in c/coldchain · 11 points · 2 years ago
Do you have the logger trace?
comment on triple agonist: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 67 points · 2 years ago
comment on the Australia question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/glp1aus · 10 points · 2 years ago
TGA shortage notices are temporary
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 2.5mg and the fatigue got better, not worse in c/retatrutide · 140 points · 2 years ago