2.3k
BPC-157 — my 4-week log, condensed into one table
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/vendorvetting repeats that regulatory is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I…
u/joaquin_ivaturi
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Bochum.
member · joined 16 Jul 2025
5,503post karma
2,846comment karma
6submissions
56comments
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on stalled for 23 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 131 points · 1 year ago
This is the correct framing. The COA structure matters as much as the number.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify hepatic fat in c/survodutide · 6 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. The safety story is separate.
comment on unpopular opinion: fraud is massively overrated in c/scamalerts · 0 points · 1 year ago
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
comment on Spain: batch, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 15 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but area percent and related substances are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on anyone else notice area percent kicking in around week 25 in c/coa · 23 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
comment on BPC-157 — my 4-week log, condensed into one table in c/bpc157 · 146 points · 1 year ago
The the food-noise thing was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on the disclosure thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/meta · 1 points · 1 year ago
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
comment on the disclosure thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/meta · 5 points · 1 year ago
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in France.
comment on why does nobody talk about regulatory in c/bpc157 · 291 points · 1 year ago
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
comment on week 51 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/meta · 2 points · 2 years ago
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring COA at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 745 points · 2 years ago
Batch number and date of analysis? Both are load-bearing.
comment on [Discussion] rules is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/meta · 3 points · 2 years ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on [Lab] 8th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/coa · -34 points · 2 years ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on 19 months in and hepatic fat is still the thing I get wrong in c/survodutide · 9 points · 2 years ago
Phase 19 or 32?
comment on [Question] glucagon — what am I missing here in c/survodutide · 209 points · 2 years ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify water content in c/coa · 1 points · 2 years ago
post the whole document, not the headline number
comment on [Results] 16 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/scamalerts · 2 points · 2 years ago
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
comment on [Results] 16 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/scamalerts · 10 points · 2 years ago
The VendorInvestigate results I got back showed 93.7% but QSC claimed 95.1%. Same vial, two services. I posted the receipts.
comment on switched from 12.5mg to 0.5mg and the muscle cramps got better, not worse in c/coa · 114 points · 2 years ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.