u/kasper_cabrera
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Nairobi.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on stalled for 7 weeks at 10mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/vendorvetting · 3 points · 3 months ago
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about wiki until somebody posts a number in c/meta · -7 points · 4 months ago
Yeah, the evidence standard works.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on hepatic fat in c/survodutide · 66 points · 4 months ago
Yeah, glucagon co-agonism is genuinely different.
comment on the step therapy question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/insurancefights · 6 points · 4 months ago
say which country and which plan type
comment on is it normal to get nausea at week 84 in c/maintenancephase · 114 points · 5 months ago
Regain on a taper is expected. 16% back over 8 weeks, which matches the discontinuation data. Planned for it.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring vendor at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 26 points · 5 months ago
CPC took 2 days to answer an email and the material was flawless.
Adding to this: testing is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on maintenance — my 7-week log, condensed into one table in c/maintenancephase · 10 points · 5 months ago
Regain on a taper is expected. 15% back over 30 weeks, which matches the discontinuation data. Planned for it.
comment on [Discussion] biopsy is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/survodutide · -2 points · 5 months ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on help me understand MASH, I have read the wiki twice in c/survodutide · 1 points · 6 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on switched from 7.5mg to 15mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse in c/insurancefights · 6 points · 7 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Discussion] goal weight is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/maintenancephase · 69 points · 7 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 97.2, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on 19 months in and disclosure is still the thing I get wrong in c/meta · -13 points · 7 months ago
the 17 month rule change is in effect
comment on [Discussion] the reship advice in here is 13 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 105 points · 8 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on unpopular opinion: formulary is massively overrated in c/insurancefights · 22 points · 8 months ago
Crossposting this to c/cryptopay because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on external review is the most under-discussed thing in c/glp1muscle in c/insurancefights · 441 points · 8 months ago
Strongly agree. Step therapy is predictable if you have the criteria.
comment on tried wiki for 6 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 2 points · 8 months ago
the wiki is the source
comment on [Lab] SGN survo — VendorInvestigate came back 99.0% against a claimed 99.1% in c/survodutide · 7 points · 9 months ago
Yeah, glucagon co-agonism is genuinely different.
comment on the vendor question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/vendorvetting · 108 points · 10 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 6 weeks, not 36. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on does regain actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/maintenancephase · 6 points · 10 months ago
nobody posts about this part and it is the longest part
comment on [Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on rules in c/meta · 12 points · 10 months ago
Strongly agree. Transparency wins.