u/liv_kuipers
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kaunas.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
Comments — page 2 of 3
comment on dose stretching — 7 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 154 points · 4 months ago
Tracking number removed.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 90 weeks to accept.
comment on dose stretching — 7 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 225 points · 4 months ago
comment on 5 months in and Medutest is still the thing I get wrong in c/vendorvetting · 30 points · 5 months ago
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
comment on someone explain Janoshik to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/vendorvetting · 7 points · 5 months ago
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
comment on someone explain Janoshik to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/vendorvetting · 14 points · 5 months ago
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
comment on [Results] 7 weeks, 41kg, and formulary was the hard part in c/insurancefights · 18 points · 5 months ago
This is correct. Appeal letters work.
comment on [Discussion] order records is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/vendorvetting · 3 points · 5 months ago
Removed a chain here.
Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for co-agonism posts in c/cagrilintide · 77 points · 6 months ago
Strongly agree. REDEFINE is phase 22, not final.
comment on reading Janoshik threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/vendorvetting · 3 points · 7 months ago
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on small win: satiety stopped being a problem at week 30 in c/cagrilintide · 16 points · 8 months ago
CagriSema ratios in trials are fixed, do not extrapolate self-mixing
comment on does PeptideMeter actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/vendorvetting · 5 points · 8 months ago
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
comment on Denmark: step therapy, and what it actually costs here in c/insurancefights · 0 points · 9 months ago
Copay was step therapy for the copay then another 22% of the total.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on is it normal to get nausea at week 44 in c/insurancefights · 84 points · 10 months ago
What was the denial code?
comment on [PSA] lowest effective dose is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/maintenancephase · 5 points · 1 year ago
state how long you have been at maintenance, week 5 is not maintenance
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about regain until somebody posts a number in c/maintenancephase · 65 points · 1 year ago
Weight variance within what range?
comment on week 11 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 60 points · 1 year ago
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
comment on [Results] 82 weeks, 10kg, and long term was the hard part in c/maintenancephase · 10 points · 1 year ago
the plateau is where the learning happens
comment on three years of REDEFINE threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/cagrilintide · 102 points · 1 year ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on small win: goal weight stopped being a problem at week 20 in c/maintenancephase · 142 points · 1 year ago
lowest effective dose is lowest effective dose, find it or stay higher
comment on small win: goal weight stopped being a problem at week 20 in c/maintenancephase · 45 points · 1 year ago
dose-stretching experiences welcome, dose-stretching instructions are not