[Results] 82 weeks, 10kg, and long term was the hard part
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking maintenance against eGFR for 29 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, maintenance is the boring part and the important part.
Regain on a taper is expected. 19% back over 23 weeks, which matches the discontinuation data. Planned for it.
[removed by moderator]
[removed by moderator]
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 96 weeks to accept.
Yeah, maintenance is the boring part and the important part.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
Flair changed to match the content.
Adding to this: goal weight is doing more work than the comment implies.
food noise returns but not always immediately
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with maintenance, not with what you concluded.
Yeah, maintenance is the boring part and the important part.
the lowest dose you can stay on is not the lowest dose that works
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
the plateau is where the learning happens
food noise returns but not always immediately
- 1Yeah, maintenance is the boring part and the important part.9 comments in this branch · started by u/hedda_aguirre
- 2Yeah, maintenance is the boring part and the important part.5 comments in this branch · started by u/fatima_yildiz