u/liv_vukovic
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Palermo.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
Comments — page 2 of 3
comment on survodutide vs glucagon — genuinely asking which matters more in c/survodutide · 26 points · 8 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points.
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on 503A — 12 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/compounding · 43 points · 9 months ago
state board rules differ, say which state
comment on Denmark: step therapy, and what it actually costs here in c/insurancefights · 86 points · 9 months ago
Canada plan: step therapy required 24 medications first. Did them all, got approval. The order matters.
comment on [Lab] SGN survo — VendorInvestigate came back 99.0% against a claimed 99.1% in c/survodutide · 18 points · 9 months ago
the MASH indication changes the risk calculus
comment on [Question] API source — what am I missing here in c/compounding · 100 points · 9 months ago
telehealth costs 503A plus compounding markup, total varies
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on fatigue in c/sideeffects · 94 points · 10 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on copay — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/insurancefights · 70 points · 10 months ago
Strongly agree. Step therapy is predictable if you have the criteria.
comment on anyone else notice dual agonist kicking in around week 80 in c/survodutide · 93 points · 11 months ago
the GLP-1/glucagon dual is hepatic fat, different from GIP/GLP-1
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 1.7mg and the muscle cramps got better, not worse in c/sideeffects · 252 points · 12 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on help me understand denial, I have read the wiki twice in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 1 year ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on help me understand denial, I have read the wiki twice in c/insurancefights · 377 points · 1 year ago
the carve-out clause varies by employer
comment on 6 months in and glucagon is still the thing I get wrong in c/survodutide · 30 points · 1 year ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
comment on prior authorization is the most under-discussed thing in c/glp1muscle in c/insurancefights · -2 points · 1 year ago
redact member ids and group numbers from every screenshot
comment on reflux — my 12-week log, condensed into one table in c/sideeffects · 68 points · 1 year ago
week 42 and the constipation is finally getting better
comment on reflux — my 12-week log, condensed into one table in c/sideeffects · 140 points · 1 year ago
My early fullness was worst at 15mg and better at 12.5mg, which makes no sense but it is real.
comment on step therapy — my 7-week log, condensed into one table in c/insurancefights · 112 points · 1 year ago
prior auth criteria are state-specific, formulary differs
comment on is it normal to get muscle cramps at week 94 in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 1 year ago
formulary exclusions are negotiable sometimes
comment on [Discussion] the 503A advice in here is 23 years out of date in c/compounding · 4 points · 1 year ago
the the UK situation is different from the US, different regulations
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about compounding until somebody posts a number in c/compounding · 37 points · 1 year ago
the shortage list is temporary, it ends and compounding becomes illegal again
comment on three years of heart rate threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/sideeffects · 40 points · 1 year ago
nausea on day 2 is normal, nausea after week 61 is worth checking