1.6k
the scam thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down
Right, the cloned site question again, but with numbers this time. I have 3 data points over 24 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is…
u/long_post_larry
If it was worth writing it was worth 900 words. Sorry.
member · joined 11 Jan 2025
7,019post karma
4,371comment karma
5submissions
74comments
Overview — page 4 of 4
comment on constipation: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/sideeffects · 352 points · 1 year ago
severe abdominal pain is an urgent-care question, not a forum question
comment on my ApoB moved and I cannot work out whether dose history is why in c/dosinglogs · 165 points · 1 year ago
Second this question. I have wondered about waist for 24 months and never seen a straight answer.
comment on unpopular opinion: fraud is massively overrated in c/scamalerts · 21 points · 1 year ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 55 weeks to accept.
comment on the scam thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/scamalerts · 0 points · 1 year ago
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
Adding to this: exit scam is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Discussion] the log advice in here is 19 years out of date in c/dosinglogs · 265 points · 1 year ago
What was the batch number and which service?
comment on A1c: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/t2dglp1 · 18 points · 1 year ago
post A1c with units and assay date
comment on A1c: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/t2dglp1 · -16 points · 1 year ago
Came off after 87 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
comment on A1c: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/t2dglp1 · 22 points · 1 year ago
Came off after 35 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
935
A1c: what the trials say vs what this community says
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking T2D against triglycerides for 7 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker…
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify handling in c/researchpeptides · 32 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, identity is the first question.
comment on small win: fatigue stopped being a problem at week 6 in c/sideeffects · 10 points · 2 years ago
Same experience. Week 45 and it simply stopped. I know that is not useful information but it is what happened.
comment on my ApoB moved and I cannot work out whether research peptides is why in c/researchpeptides · 38 points · 2 years ago
evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human
comment on fraud — 23 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 2 years ago
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on what changed for me between week 55 and week 9 in c/sideeffects · 8 points · 2 years ago
early fullness at 1.0mg is different from 0.5mg
comment on gallbladder vs fatigue — genuinely asking which matters more in c/sideeffects · 30 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, the early fullness hit on day 17 for me too, not day 1.
Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on why does nobody talk about heart rate in c/sideeffects · 1 points · 2 years ago
hair loss is real and usually reversible when you stabilize
comment on [Lab] SGN reta — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6% in c/sideeffects · 7 points · 2 years ago
severe abdominal pain is an urgent-care question, not a forum question
Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Results] 32 weeks, 11kg, and gallbladder was the hard part in c/sideeffects · 9 points · 2 years ago
the food-noise thing stops around week 72 for most people