u/meera_sandvik
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Mombasa.
member · joined 14 May 2025
comment on [Question] small molecule means purity testing is a different problem, right in c/orforglipron · 29 points · 4 days ago
phase 16 data is interesting, phase 6 will tell the real story
comment on £18 USB logger settled a three-week argument in thirty seconds in c/coldchain · 30 points · 7 days ago
Not convinced.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 69 weeks to accept.
comment on [Pattern] the nine scams. that is it. there are only nine. in c/scamalerts · 6 points · 8 days ago
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Below Spec] 61.2% on a vial that shipped with a 99% COA in c/labresults · 6 points · 9 days ago
Yeah, the Medutest number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on [Data] my fridge is 2.1°C at the back and 7.8°C in the door. same fridge. in c/coldchain · 5 points · 11 days ago
Slight fix: the number was 97.2, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on [PSA] "we are the manufacturer" plus a Gmail address is the whole tell in c/scamalerts · 9 points · 16 days ago
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
comment on [Janoshik] GL Biochem raw material vs a reseller vial of the same compound in c/labresults · 0 points · 26 days ago
Yeah, the Medutest number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on light exposure matters more for some compounds than others and nobody tabulates it in c/coldchain · 34 points · 1 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on [Medutest] SWB sema — 98.2%, cold chain intact, 9 days transit in c/labresults · 11 points · 1 months ago
inter-lab variance is real, 14 points is inside normal
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify glucagon in c/survodutide · 14 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. The safety story is separate.
comment on the fake COA thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/scamalerts · 2 points · 1 months ago
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
comment on genuine question about biopsy that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/survodutide · 16 points · 1 months ago
This is correct. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.
comment on am I the only one who found data logger harder than the injections in c/coldchain · 8 points · 1 months ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is stability. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on Germany: water content, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 23 points · 2 months ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 40 in c/coa · 10 points · 2 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on [PSA] non-peptide is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/orforglipron · 2 points · 2 months ago
small molecule purity is different testing than peptides
comment on am I the only one who found below spec harder than the injections in c/labresults · 5 points · 2 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on am I the only one who found below spec harder than the injections in c/labresults · 9 points · 2 months ago
sample of one, say so
comment on am I the only one who found below spec harder than the injections in c/labresults · 10 points · 2 months ago
GGPeps product, PeptideMeter test, 99.1% result, batch 17, 6 days in transit. Logged.
comment on what changed for me between week 30 and week 73 in c/coa · 73 points · 2 months ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.