[PSA] non-peptide is not what most of this community thinks it is
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 2.5mg to 1.0mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 16 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have muscle cramps I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 37 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
the small molecule is whether this actually works long-term
oral non-peptide agonist is small molecule, no food restrictions
the supply conversation changes if this approves
Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 96.8. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in Spain.
the absorption problem is solved by non-peptide structure
the small molecule is whether this actually works long-term
small molecule, not a peptide, purity discussion is different
New Zealand here. Waited 3 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total cost was roughly what I expected.
small molecule purity is different testing than peptides
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
- 1Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be…9 comments in this branch · started by u/bruno_dumitru