u/milos_vestergaard
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Tours.
member · joined 18 Sep 2025
comment on [Failure] 61.2% purity on a vial i had already been using for six weeks in c/darkspot · 1 points · 5 days ago
Strongly agree.
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Appeal] the external review process nobody tells you exists in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 5 days ago
step therapy documentation is the weapon, use it
comment on [Failure] vendor packed a cold box with no thermal mass. just foam and hope. in c/coldchain · 3 points · 14 days ago
stability after excursion is not zero, it is dose-dependent
comment on [Regain] 4kg back over a year and i am calling that a win in c/maintenancephase · 11 points · 15 days ago
weight moves within 21kg and that is normal
comment on three years of special authorization threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1canada · 7 points · 15 days ago
private plans vary by employer
comment on freezing reconstituted product: why the answer is no in c/coldchain · 94 points · 19 days ago
Removed a chain here.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 60 weeks to accept.
comment on freezing reconstituted product: why the answer is no in c/coldchain · 44 points · 19 days ago
time-at-temperature integral is the dose, not just peak temperature
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 18 weeks to accept.
comment on [Question] Poland — has anyone got a straight answer on jurisdiction in c/customs · 15 points · 23 days ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring personal import at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/customs · 1 points · 28 days ago
Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 96.8.
Adding to this: jurisdiction is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on the Netherlands: stability, and what it actually costs here in c/coldchain · 298 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.
comment on [Failure] two years in, stopped for financial reasons, regained most of it in c/darkspot · 17 points · 1 months ago
side effects that ended someone's run
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether ice pack is why in c/coldchain · 21 points · 1 months ago
time-at-temperature integral is the dose, not just peak temperature
comment on [Meta] the regain rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/maintenancephase · 44 points · 1 months ago
regain after taper is expected, plan for it
comment on the prior authorization question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/insurancefights · 53 points · 1 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on does lost money actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/darkspot · 1 points · 2 months ago
This is correct. Evidence still required.
comment on 9 months in and jurisdiction is still the thing I get wrong in c/customs · 6 points · 2 months ago
import countries have different thresholds
comment on stability — my 7-week log, condensed into one table in c/coldchain · 2 points · 2 months ago
gel packs last 17 hours, after that you are relying on the box itself
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 1.7mg and the constipation got better, not worse in c/maintenancephase · 123 points · 2 months ago
comment on am I the only one who found order records harder than the injections in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 2 months ago
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
comment on Denmark: co-agonism, and what it actually costs here in c/cagrilintide · 1 points · 2 months ago
Strongly agree. REDEFINE is phase 23, not final.