2.4k
[Meta] proposal — a flair for survodutide posts
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking survodutide against eGFR for 21 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker…
u/nora_oyelaran
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Catania.
member · joined 14 May 2025
2,730post karma
3,791comment karma
1submissions
45comments
Overview — page 2 of 3
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether FLOW is why in c/trialwatch · 116 points · 7 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on FLOW vs TRIUMPH — genuinely asking which matters more in c/trialwatch · 5 points · 9 months ago
Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.
comment on small win: hazard ratio stopped being a problem at week 51 in c/trialwatch · 56 points · 9 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on small win: hazard ratio stopped being a problem at week 51 in c/trialwatch · 95 points · 9 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on [Question] Poland — has anyone got a straight answer on what went wrong in c/darkspot · 113 points · 10 months ago
This is correct. Evidence still required.
comment on am I the only one who found what went wrong harder than the injections in c/darkspot · 95 points · 11 months ago
the 12 order that disappeared from MKM
comment on small win: what went wrong stopped being a problem at week 30 in c/darkspot · 53 points · 11 months ago
Did anything else change in the same window?
comment on contraception — my 11-week log, condensed into one table in c/glp1women · 19 points · 11 months ago
This is correct. PCOS is real.
comment on tried SURPASS for 11 weeks. here is what happened. in c/trialwatch · 81 points · 1 year ago
SELECT reported a SURMOUNT hazard ratio but the absolute event rate is what changes clinical practice.
comment on SELECT — 9 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for survodutide posts in c/survodutide · 54 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 83 weeks to accept.
comment on genuine question about below spec that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/darkspot · 12 points · 1 year ago
no "told you so" comments, removed without discussion
comment on France: survodutide, and what it actually costs here in c/survodutide · -36 points · 1 year ago
glucagon injection is a different vector than GLP-1
comment on help me understand failure, I have read the wiki twice in c/darkspot · 13 points · 1 year ago
the lesson is the point
comment on unpopular opinion: contraception is massively overrated in c/glp1women · 77 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 21 weeks, not 25. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Discussion] the endpoint advice in here is 5 years out of date in c/trialwatch · 528 points · 1 year ago
Crossposting this to c/sideeffects because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on [Discussion] fertility is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/glp1women · 71 points · 1 year ago
PCOS and insulin resistance
comment on [Lab] SSA orfo — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 98.3% in c/darkspot · -30 points · 1 year ago
failures, regrets, things that went wrong
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on the regret thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/darkspot · 0 points · 1 year ago
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?