u/purity_pedant
Pedantry is a public service when milligrams are involved.
long-standing contributor · analytical · joined 27 Nov 2023
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on [COA] what does "related substances 1.4%" actually mean for my vial in c/coa · 61 points · 13 days ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on [Fees] network fee comparison for small orders, actual numbers in c/cryptopay · 3 points · 15 days ago
Stablecoin or other?
comment on [Discussion] denial reason codes decoded, mostly fixable paperwork in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 15 days ago
do not suggest misrepresenting a diagnosis, that is fraud
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 21 weeks to accept.
comment on [Discussion] we have no vocabulary for success that is not a number going down in c/maintenancephase · 42 points · 18 days ago
Small correction: the trial was 4 weeks, not 6. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on PDF producer string says the file was made in a browser. is that normal in c/coa · 0 points · 18 days ago
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring confirmations at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/cryptopay · 3 points · 22 days ago
Yeah, the network selection matters most.
comment on chargeback is the most under-discussed thing in c/sideeffects in c/cryptopay · 2 points · 26 days ago
escrow for group buys is standard, use it
comment on [Vendor] TFC shipping got noticeably slower after March, anyone else in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 27 days ago
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
comment on [Long Term] what my labs look like three years in in c/maintenancephase · 0 points · 28 days ago
Strongly agree. Lowest effective dose is a real discovery process.
comment on identity and quantity are two questions and most COAs answer one in c/coa · 15 points · 1 months ago
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about batch in c/coa · 20 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
comment on [Needs Source] "lab tested" with no lab named is not a claim in c/vendorvetting · 7 points · 1 months ago
How many orders from WWB is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.
comment on anyone else notice water content kicking in around week 50 in c/coa · 134 points · 1 months ago
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
comment on someone explain gas fees to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/cryptopay · 41 points · 1 months ago
memo/tag requirements differ by network
comment on someone explain gas fees to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/cryptopay · 120 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
comment on clothes fit the same for 14 months and it is genuinely strange in c/maintenancephase · 29 points · 1 months ago
How long at maintenance?
comment on reading formulary threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/insurancefights · 20 points · 1 months ago
resubmission after denial requires new documentation
comment on reading area percent threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/coa · 23 points · 2 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 98.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on denial — my 12-week log, condensed into one table in c/insurancefights · 0 points · 2 months ago
Which plan type? denial is different.
comment on the confirmations thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 2 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.