u/receipts_or_nothing

QST three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 99.2% anyway, so no harm done.

First order from HJ was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.

GGPeps order #2, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside

Is that absolute or relative risk reduction?

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

off-label use data is different from approved-indication data

number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect

vendor staff must self-identify, full stop

Adding to this: order records is doing more work than the comment implies.

I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

GL Biochem three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 97.4% anyway, so no harm done.

Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.

Mechanistically the bit that matters is SELECT.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 52 weeks to accept.

How many orders from GL Biochem is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.

referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions