u/renzo_yildiz
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Bochum.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
comment on week two, nothing is happening, everyone says that is normal, is it in c/newbiequestions · 34 points · 4 days ago
Yeah, that is totally normal for week 19.
comment on do i need to keep it in the fridge before i mix it in c/newbiequestions · 10 points · 6 days ago
be kind, condescending answers are removed
comment on [Question] why is reta purity testing so much more variable between labs in c/retatrutide · -28 points · 11 days ago
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
comment on came off reta after 14 weeks. here is the honest version. in c/retatrutide · 8 points · 12 days ago
heart rate and dose escalation need actual measurements, not impressions
comment on [Caution] hepatic endpoints need biopsy data, not an ALT screenshot in c/survodutide · 16 points · 12 days ago
rodent dual agonist is investigation only
comment on three years of glucagon threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/survodutide · 7 points · 16 days ago
Stalled for 23 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 11.
comment on [Results] 2 weeks, 6kg, and retatrutide was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 17 points · 20 days ago
the dosing is steep, the sulphur burps reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet
Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Results] 2 weeks, 6kg, and retatrutide was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 101 points · 21 days ago
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring personal import at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/customs · 1 points · 28 days ago
declared value is seizure, impacts duty
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about triple agonist in c/retatrutide · 4 points · 1 months ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is TRIUMPH. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify glucagon in c/survodutide · 11 points · 1 months ago
hepatic fat and survodutide are the story
comment on TRIUMPH: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · -21 points · 1 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on small win: normal stopped being a problem at week 6 in c/newbiequestions · 14 points · 1 months ago
link the wiki instead of retyping, but politely
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/retatrutide · 44 points · 2 months ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for first time posts in c/newbiequestions · -18 points · 2 months ago
Yeah, that is totally normal for week 5.
comment on phase 2 vs triple agonist — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 0 points · 2 months ago
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
comment on phase 2 vs triple agonist — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 186 points · 2 months ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
comment on [Lab] 17th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 149 points · 3 months ago
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
comment on reading seizure threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/customs · 24 points · 3 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with customs, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Question] dose escalation — what am I missing here in c/retatrutide · 38 points · 4 months ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.