u/signe_villalobos

phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial

ask your actual doctor, not us

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

pricing posts need date and currency

positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard

Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.

stalled on sema, tried tirz, and the curves were actually different shapes

apotheke, receta, EMA — twenty-seven different answers

handlers in the community are rare and cautious

Strongly agree. Pricing is local.

Small correction: the trial was 7 weeks, not 17. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual

Not to be pedantic but SURPASS and SURMOUNT are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

Not to be pedantic but nausea and constipation are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.

Did you stay on semaglutide or switch? The outcome is different if you are comparing.

apotheke, receta, pharmacy — twenty-seven different answers

resting heart rate moved up 21 bpm and settled back down when I stopped escalating

This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.

Week 5 for me and the honest summary is: 25kg down, sulphur burps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.