u/spreadsheet_gremlin
If it is not in a spreadsheet it did not happen. 61 tabs and counting.
long-standing contributor · data · joined 2 Apr 2024
Comments — page 4 of 5
comment on [Discussion] the purity advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/coa · -30 points · 1 year ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with area percent, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Question] formulary — what am I missing here in c/glp1canada · 5 points · 1 year ago
special authorisation is province-specific
comment on week 36 check-in — 12kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 19 points · 1 year ago
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
comment on [Meta] the dose history rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/dosinglogs · 33 points · 1 year ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about milestone in c/progresspics · 47 points · 1 year ago
text removes the comparison trap
comment on [Discussion] the vendor advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 6 points · 1 year ago
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
comment on switched from 1.7mg to 1.0mg and the fatigue got better, not worse in c/coa · 72 points · 1 year ago
axis labels included, always
comment on reship — my 22-week log, condensed into one table in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on why does nobody talk about weekly update in c/dosinglogs · 16 points · 1 year ago
consistency is harder than the dose change
comment on [Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on private plan in c/glp1canada · 583 points · 1 year ago
special authorization is the cross-province difference
comment on Janoshik vs order records — genuinely asking which matters more in c/vendorvetting · 12 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 15 weeks, not 34. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on genuine question about purity that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/coa · 199 points · 1 year ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on my ApoB moved and I cannot work out whether progress is why in c/progresspics · 40 points · 1 year ago
comment on stalled for 23 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 63 points · 1 year ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
comment on France: log, and what it actually costs here in c/dosinglogs · 9 points · 1 year ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #5 — Denmark, 3 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/dosinglogs · 70 points · 1 year ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on does goal actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/progresspics · 50 points · 1 year ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on does dose history actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/dosinglogs · 41 points · 1 year ago
What are you comparing it against though?
comment on Spain: batch, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 196 points · 1 year ago
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about weekly update in c/dosinglogs · 213 points · 1 year ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.